Tech-Backed PACs Roll Out First Candidate Ads for 2026
A newly organized alliance of political action committees promoting artificial intelligence has unveiled its first round of candidate ads for the 2026 midterm elections. Their launch comes as the national conversation on AI oversight gains momentum and becomes a central policy issue heading into the next political cycle.
The coalition, known as Leading the Future, is a bipartisan network supporting candidates who favor strengthening the United States’ position in AI development. Their first ads spotlight competitive congressional races in Texas and New York, hinting at the massive financial role the tech industry is expected to play as the elections draw near. According to the group, this marks the beginning of a multi-million-dollar advertising strategy that will continue through the primary season.
New PACs Enter the AI Policy Arena
Leading the Future is one of several groups jumping into the political push around AI. Former lawmakers Brad Carson (D) and Chris Stewart (R) recently teamed up to launch Public First, a network of super PACs backing candidates committed to shaping AI policy. Meta has also joined the mix with its own bipartisan committee, the American Technology Excellence Project, focused partly on pushing back against restrictive state-level AI rules.
Their emergence reflects the extraordinary influence AI now has across the economy. Over just a few years, artificial intelligence has transformed the stock market, reshaped corporate strategies, and become part of everyday digital life. Tech giants such as Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Oracle, Meta, and OpenAI continue pouring billions into AI innovation, hoping to secure dominance in a rapidly expanding sector. Chipmaker Nvidia even hit a historic milestone earlier this year, becoming the first company in the world valued at $5 trillion.
Public Worry Grows as AI Advances Rapidly
Despite its promise, AI is also sparking serious concern. Critics argue that tech companies are moving faster than regulators can keep up, raising dangers around privacy, misinformation, national security, and child safety. Many pioneers within the industry have echoed these warnings, urging government leaders to take a more active role in preventing potential harm.
Recent national surveys reveal that Americans across party lines share similar levels of anxiety about AI’s increased presence in daily life. Large majorities say they want strict government oversight— even if it slows technological development.
Leading the Future supports establishing a single national regulatory framework, warning that a patchwork of state rules would slow innovation and weaken American competitiveness. This perspective aligns with the current administration, which has signaled plans to create a centralized federal guideline for AI policies. The President recently announced an upcoming executive order designed to override state-level regulations in favor of a unified approach.
Meanwhile, House Democrats have formed a Commission on AI and the Innovation Economy, which will work with industry experts to develop policy recommendations.
Ads Highlight a Growing Policy Divide
Leading the Future’s first ads highlight clear differences in how candidates view AI regulation. One spot endorses Chris Gober, a Republican running in Texas’ 10th district, framing him as a strong conservative voice focused on boosting American technological competitiveness. Although the ad does not directly mention AI, it promotes “advancing U.S. tech leadership” in the global race.
Another ad takes aim at New York Assemblyman Alex Bores, who has advocated for stronger state-level AI safeguards. The ad portrays his proposals as restrictive and potentially damaging to innovation. Bores responded by accusing tech billionaires and national leaders of resisting necessary protections for workers, children, and national security.
